wholesale african gold plated jewelry set Will Liang Li really be sentenced to life? Is China's legal equality? Human nature?

wholesale african gold plated jewelry set

7 thoughts on “wholesale african gold plated jewelry set Will Liang Li really be sentenced to life? Is China's legal equality? Human nature?”

  1. plumeria jewelry wholesale Everyone knows that Liang Lilai's ins and out, I am not tired. The trial results of the case may be in the two legal terms: "illegal occupation" or "stealing". Great, the maximum penalty may face life imprisonment. As ordinary people, we must abandon personal emotional colors and personal emotions, instead of judging this case, not because the defendant is a "vulnerable group" to give sympathy for social morality, regardless of social order, regardless of the "rule of law society" to support Liang Li, and even get to get it. The "Hu Bin Case" compares with other cases we consider unfairly, so that we also have the justice of the law, but also run counter to the original intention of the law. We should stand on the perspective of the law. In a case, if we despise the law, it is ourselves!
    If we want to judge whether Liang Li is committed to "theft" or "illegal occupation", then we should first know the two : It refers to the purpose of illegal possession, secretly stealing a large amount of public and private property or a multiple theft of public and private property. If you have it, the amount is large, and if you refuse to be refunded, it will be sentenced to imprisonment, detention or fines of less than two years; if the amount is huge or other serious circumstances, it will be imprisoned for two years and five years. The illegal occupation of the forgotten or buried objects of others is illegally, and the amount is large and refused to hand over. At the scene of the incident, around 8:20 am that day, Liang Liru cleaned in the airport waiting hall. When she first reached the boarding counter on the 19th, she saw two female passengers near the trash can with With a child in the seeds of melon, there is a luggage car in the middle of them, and a small carton similar to instant noodles is placed on the car. After five or six minutes, the two passengers hurried into the security door. Liang Li came for the second time to come to By the trash can on Counter 19, I saw the small carton was still on the luggage car. I thought they had discarded it. If there were no one to see it, I cleaned the small carton as an abandoned object to the cleaning car. Then Liang Li continued to continue Working in the hall. At about 9 o'clock, Liang Li walked to the 16th toilet at the north side of the hall about 79 meters away from the launch of the incident. , First put it in the toilet in the hands of the disabled. If someone claims it, it will be returned. (From 3 pig news) This journalist is relatively strong. Following her thinking, then we can actually determine whether Liang Li has the willingness to be theft based on limited news materials. For the first time, Liang Li saw that "carton" was the owner and owner. Seeing the "carton" for the second time, the owner was already "not there", and Liang Li, who was a cleaning worker at the airport, was responsible for cleaning up the debris on the luggage car (similar to overtaking) provided by the airport. At this time, she She hasn't touched the "carton" yet. Her subjective will believe that the "carton" is a white four -square -shaped paper garbage. ) The quality of the carton (14kg) will give Liang Li some information, of course The main thing is that this "carton" is not garbage! Of course, Liang Li did not know that it was a gold jewelry worth three million (according to news reports, Liang Li said that it might be a battery at the time), and this is Liang Li's perception of this paper box. It is the property abandoned! So can the property that Liang Li believes is the abandonment of the guest's abandonment is to judge illegal occupation, and the property discarded by the guests is not a battery but a gold jewelry worth 3 million. Crime, if we picked up a carton and a carton with gold on the road, would we also reject the behavior I picked because of the real value of gold ornaments (I know that picking things is not illegal) Then he believes that Liang Li is not theft, not even illegal occupation, the most (morality low)!
    : At 4 pm, colleague Liang Li, Cao, shouted downstairs in her rental house, saying that what you picked up, and the owner had reported the police. Liang Li told Cao that it would be enough to go to work every day. At about 6 o'clock in the evening, the two came to Liang Li's house and said they were police officers and asked her if she picked up a carton. After Liang Li confirmed that they were really police, they took the initiative to take out the carton from the bed and handed them to them. The police took the Liang Li family to the police station. It shows that Liang Li cooperated with the police and did not have illegal occupation and refused to hand over various criminal acts that comply with Article 270 (Baidu Encyclopedia). Out, this kind of human fantasy is also meaningless!
    result, "I think" Liang Li is not guilty!

  2. jewelry from africa wholesale Liang Li picked up the gold case, and finally did not investigate criminal responsibility.
    Event process:
    December 9, 2008
    The airport cleaner Liang Li "picks up" gold jewelry worth more than 3 million yuan at the airport. That night, he was brought back to the police station by the public security organs for investigation. On March 12, 2009
    The public security organs issued a letter of complaints on the case of the Liang Li case on suspicion of theft. Subsequently, the procuratorate officially approved Liang Li for suspected theft.
    April 30, 2009

    The case was reviewed by the Shenzhen Procuratorate and sent the Baoan District Procuratorate.
    May 11, 2009
    The "stealing" or "picking", which caused widespread argument. Many well -known scholars in the legal community expressed their views, and more than 3 million netizens participated in the online survey of various websites.
    May 15, 2009
    The police said Liang Li's theft evidence was conclusive. On May 22, 2009, the president of the Guangdong High Court first talked about the female worker's "picking" gold suspected theft, saying that he would be tried in accordance with the law.
    May 29, 2009
    The public security organs transferred the investigation to the procuratorate for review and prosecution.
    July 13, 2009
    The second time the Baoan District Procuratorate returned the Liangli case to the public security organs to supplement the investigation.
    September 10, 2009
    . Liang Li was taken for a bail pending trial.
    September 25, 2009
    This due to insufficient evidence, the Procuratorate of Shenzhen Baoan District notified Liang Li for not constituting theft, revoking the bail pending measures, and not filed a public prosecution. However, the procuratorate believes that the case is more in line with the characteristics of the occupation crime. According to the principle of "criminal doubt", the case is sent back to the public security organs; whether to sue Liang Li, it is determined by the victim's Dongguan Golden Dragon Jewelry Jewelry Co., Ltd.

  3. los angeles wholesale jewelry supplies There are a lot of questions!
    It the following questions, I am afraid that the victim will not be able to answer it!
    1. When a complete packaging box is found, do you think it is a mineral water bottle and other discarded objects? You must think it is more valuable, so you decide to transfer to other places! The subjective intention is clear!
    2. When the verification inside is the gold jewelry, I still think that it is a 'fake gold jewelry' to take home, and take ‘fake’ as myself! Intersection Intersection Both subjective consciousness and objective behavior confirm the purpose of possession!
    3. When the police asked, they still said that they did not take anything. Under the police inquiry, they had to remember to remember it and take a box home! At this time, the box had been closed, knowing that I used to get a box of golden items, and said it as a box! Just get rid of yourself!
    4, she said that no one was watching when she saw the box, thinking it was discarded! Who knows if she was observing that the possible owner was not present or left (the children sitting in the box and their adults boarded the plane), and confirmed that after this opportunity, she took the sheep away?

Leave a Comment